Linus Torvalds writes: (Summary)
This looks odd and unnecessary.
This looks odd and unnecessary.
Why isn't this just a
Why isn't this just a
sigdelsetmask(signal, SIG_KERNEL_STOP_MASK);
sigdelsetmask(signal, SIG_KERNEL_STOP_MASK);
since all of the traditional stop bits should be in the low mask. I see that we apparently have this stupid pattern elsewhere too, and it looks like it's because we stupidly say "are the RT signals in the non-legacy set", when that definitely cannot be the case for the (very much legacy) tty flow control signals.
much legacy) tty flow control signals.
Linus
Linus
Linus
This looks odd and unnecessary.
Why isn't this just a
Why isn't this just a
sigdelsetmask(signal, SIG_KERNEL_STOP_MASK);
sigdelsetmask(signal, SIG_KERNEL_STOP_MASK);
since all of the traditional stop bits should be in the low mask. I see that we apparently have this stupid pattern elsewhere too, and it looks like it's because we stupidly say "are the RT signals in the non-legacy set", when that definitely cannot be the case for the (very much legacy) tty flow control signals.
much legacy) tty flow control signals.
Linus
Linus
Linus