Quantcast
Channel: lkml.org : Ganesh Sittampalam
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 627

Re: [RFC 2/2] x86/pti/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 entry trampoline

$
0
0
Linus Torvalds writes: (Summary) I'd rather expose less (think MAXCPU) and then have the CPU hotplug code expose the page as the CPU comes up? The "disgusting" part is that I think it could/should share more code with the vsyscall case, and the whole target-pte checking and setting should be shared too.
should be shared too.
Beause not being shared, I react to this:
Beause not being shared, I react to this:

[...]

+ set_pte(target_pte, pfn_pte(pa >> Do we want/need the PVOP cases, and if so, why doesn't the vsyscall case need it?
so, why doesn't the vsyscall case need it?
Anyway, I love the approach, and how this gets rid of the nasty trampoline, so no real complaints, just "this needs some fixups".

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 627

Trending Articles