Linus Torvalds writes: (Summary) wrote:
I think it would be lovely to get linux-next back eventually, but it sounds like it's just too noisy right now, and yes, we should have a baseline for the standard tree first.
baseline for the standard tree first.
But once there's a "this is known for the baseline", I think adding linux-next back in and then maybe even have linux-next simply just kick out trees that cause problems would be a good idea. Because the more things get found and fixed before they even hit my tree, the better.
tree, the better.
Linus
Linus
Linus
[...]
printk() patches.I think it would be lovely to get linux-next back eventually, but it sounds like it's just too noisy right now, and yes, we should have a baseline for the standard tree first.
baseline for the standard tree first.
But once there's a "this is known for the baseline", I think adding linux-next back in and then maybe even have linux-next simply just kick out trees that cause problems would be a good idea. Because the more things get found and fixed before they even hit my tree, the better.
tree, the better.
Linus
Linus
Linus